To clarify, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Although there is noticeably moments in the film that steer towards the interviewer, interviewee style of interaction, the communication between Watson and his subjects can certainly be seen as intimate and personal. I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully. RAIN IN MY HEART. Secondly, Watson must have gone through a pre-planning stage where he would have had to choose the subjects he wished to include, therefore it couldnt have been as completely objective/unbiased as it seemed. She was also married to him. He is good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to create a moment. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. This can be seen when Watson is speaking to Toni about her addiction, something that Toni profusely denies she is. I find it hard to imagine a way Watson could have made this film without the, sometimes unjust, use of the subjects. Although, there are several moments when this filmmaker and subject relationship is close to breach, he retains his role of confidentiality and recognizes that the subject may not be too sober to make such ethical decisions of what they would like in the final cut or not. I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/20/mondaymediasection4. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rain-In-My-Heart-Documentary-In-Memory-Of-My-Dad-Toni-And-Vanda/233416877232. Watson himself has said that he received criticism for not helping his subjects; this could be an argument of him exploiting his subjects. In Rain in my Heart she is living in a council flat. Surely, this would mean that his documentary would attract more viewings but at least that would mean that more and more people would learn and be warned about the effects of alcoholism. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. During the film one of the subjects Mark says If I am not a advert for not drinking then I dont know what is. These subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent comes into question. francescamancini88. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. When he asks of her troubled past, he is very interrogative as he continues to ask until she is brought to tears by the discussion of her brothers death, but rather than stop, he pushes on. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. The film probably brought him a lot of attention (both positive and negative), which means hes profited from filming his subjects problems. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. In all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative. I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. With a limited number of options given that he had great difficulty finding a location and subjects to film it was essential that Watson was able to capture the gritty reality of alcoholism and addiction in a way that will haunt the audience for some time. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. However, although Watson reveals his inner moral debates, it does not stop him using his observational and interview style to get footage and shots that exploit the subjects. If he had interfered then he could have been potentially saving lives. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. By going that extra further he creates a relationship with the subjects. My DF was a chronic alcoholic (who died after eventually committing suicide) and I grew up with my parents while social circle being people in AA and Al-anon so maybe it was less of a shock to me as I've seen most of this first hand. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. He also gained the trust of his subjects to the extent that Vanda confined in him regarding her abuse as a child, and Nigels wife wanting Watson to be there when she said goodbye to him. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. A prime example of this in the documentary was when Vanda (under the influence of alcohol) decided to share her demons and reasons for her addiction. Want to save money? That we cant see others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be shown in such a state. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. The film charts the traumas faced by the alcoholics as they bounce between Gillingham Medway Maritime Hospital and their homes, and highlights the emotional impact their struggle has had on those around them. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. In comparison to other hard-hitting and eye opening documentaries and coverage of alcohol/substance addictions, I think that Rain In My Heart is hardly exploitative at all. This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. He had been in a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up. Thus, having the camera in front of them made me feel that there was a sense of pressure on them to fulfil a certain image of an alcoholic. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. (2006). Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. Watson states from the very beginning of the film that he is working with the only four patients who have agreed my intrusions and me filming their hell. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. After drinking heavily, people are definitely not in a normal status, which lead to a question that in what situation Paul Watson get the consent from these alcoholics. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. But all of these elements and attitudes of the filmmaker were performed in order to achieve a result of what alcoholism really is and of how serious and dangerous its consequences can be. Voyeurism this is not. Currently, Penny Parker's life was great. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. I mean most people wouldntHer reaction to his question is also an example as she seemed to be in pain by his disbelief and lack of trust.she even said why else would she be in the state she is in if not because of the trauma she had been through? Therefore, maybe his techniques did actually work quite well, although flawed and subjective in places. However, I dont think you should abuse the power and trust given by the four patients. I think the problems of ethics in filmmaking cannot be solved. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? Frank Sinatra Lyrics "Rain In My Heart" My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, It followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one NHS hospital in Kent (the only one that would let him in). Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. This bereavement card features rain only over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. He is a quite good interviewer, especially in the interaction between him and the characters. I think this leads them to be manipulated easily. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . Print this design in the 3.5 x 5" size. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. We ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer. 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. The subject was in a particularly vulnerable state and he took advantage of that and filmed her confession. However, from what I saw in the film, Watson does take advantages on his subjects. Listen to Rain In My Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. 2022. However, it doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a bad thing. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. And it tells us a lot; it is educational, eye opening and informative. Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. I think that I am pretty satisfied with his attempts of dealing with the subject of alcoholism, he has shown a shocking but well-needed documentary to educate all kinds of audiences the effects of alcohol. Once she confesses her heartbreaking childhood, Watson mentions that he will check with her tomorrow to see whether she still wants it to be put in [the final cut of the documentary]. To argue my point further, there is a particular example from Rain In My Heart that exemplifies this problem. What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. The world was slowly healing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. Paul Watson does a good job at creating face and gives the appearance of being genuinely interested and sympathetic so in that way it is easier for us to lower our defensive walls and absorb what the documentary is trying to tell us. This however does not detract from the fact that I believe some of what Watson did, did push the boundaries on what is ethical and moral within a documentary. That is something which I felt could have been left out, as it only showed her weak points and did not help in the documentaries focus on her alcohol problem. Mr. Stark was okay, although he still had scars from the snap. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. SACRAMENTO, Calif. More rain and snow swept through Northern California on Monday, a day after a historic downpour set records and led to dangerous situations on roadways, street flooding,. Paul Watson was capturing the real lives of these alcoholics, he was not interfering with their actions and allowed alcoholics who were told if they drink anymore they could die, to drink. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. One example from the documentary which I felt that could have made some people to view as Watson exploiting his subjects would be when one of his subject revealed (when she was highly intoxicated) that she had been sexually abused by her father. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. It brings to light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e. Because I think it break the engagement of the audience. This was maybe to excuse himself for what he maybe shouldnt have been doing and to tell the viewer that yes he thought it was wrong, but he was doing it for a reason to explore a topic that most people are scared of exploring. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. Personally, I would much rather watch Robert Winstons documentary series on the human body which ended with the filming of a mans death, from cancer, than go Watsons questionable film techniques. I think that Watson when immersed with these subjects he formed a friendship with, learning to really like some of them and he himself tries to stop some of his subjects from drinking because he wants to see the best happen for them. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. Although this might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson pushed them to their limits. Director Paul Watson See production, box office & company info Add to Watchlist 5 User reviews Won 1 BAFTA Award 2 wins & 1 nomination total Photos Add photo More like this 6.7 However, what I think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects of the film in terms of education. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. When researching the film I found a web page (which is a old BBC one). However I think that this documentary can appear that way simply because it is so intimate and explicit. White envelopes included. There were also times where Watson was rather firm and intrusive in his questioning of Vandas childhood and life. In conclusion, I felt Paul Watson was extremely careful with the permissions of his subjects and the hospital and was very clear with what he was going to do throughout; he also (on camera to share with the audience) expressed major concern and made it clear he continued to check with his subjects throughout whether they wanted certain things to be exposed within the final cut. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. Explaining hell it is. It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. I would not have the heavens fair, After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. It was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was overwhelmed by its message. For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. At first, I believe, Watson had every intention in trying to, in the most effective way possible, try and exploit his subjects. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. Join Date; 14th June, 2011. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). Read about our approach to external linking. In The Cove (2009) we needed to see how they got the cameras where they did, but in this film I felt that Watson should have left his comments for the bonus DVD. He says My job is to explain, not entertain. There were some scenes in which the people he was filming were obviously out of it and not at all in a healthy condition, physically or mentally. Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given) 0 Thanks (Received) 0 Likes (Given) 0 Likes (Received) 0 This allowed the subjects to be themselves around him as Mark said that he didnt hide his bottle of wine from Watson and the camera because this is what the film is all about. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. The most obvious example is the scene where Vanda (being drunk) tells Paul about the monsters in her head, even though she did not want to talk about that when she was sober. Another point in this film is when Paul Watson films a drunk subject who discusses the, monsters in her head, which she previously was not ready to do. The subjects and the families were happy to be filmed and it was unlikely that the film was going to bring more harm than good it was important that he looked at the whole picture and the awareness he could spread with such a film. From a documentarians point of view, Watson did a remarkable job of exploring the brutality of a taboo subject, but from a moral standpoint, the filmmaker may not have been exploitative in his actions but he was definitely extreme. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. However, this scene does give greatest insight in to why Vanda is an alcoholic, and given the nature of the documentary, this is a critical point that must be conveyed to the viewer to give most depth to the understanding of alcoholism. Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. I was completely satisfied with his attempts to deal with accusations of taking advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film. If she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she? So yes, as we saw during the screening, he was primarily affected by alcohols effect on his father and then consequently, his entire family. She then replies with a smirk, Obviously. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . From a personal level I felt it was very moving and eye opening to me on this subject. Are you satisfied by his attempts within the film to deal with such accusations? Paul Watson has none of this. Thats exactly what I think about the film: it is extreme and crude in some scenes but this cannot be translated as exploitation but as accurate and careful explanation and evidence of a serious phenomenon such as alcoholism. I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. I felt as if Watson was genuine in the fact that he did care, he wanted to see the subjects overcome their problems, in a scene where he is at Vandas house, he stands with her and says although he cant stop Vanda from drinking, he doesnt want to see her do it. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. This for me was an awkward introduction to have with a subject you are going to see go through an emotional and dark period. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. It is not a pleastant sound. WEEK 4 QUESTION:Are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in this film? As Watson edits his film himself he gets to choose what stays in the final cut, therefore raising other ethical issues as he may have only chosen to show the subjects at their worst and in very emotional states. There is one point I dont like about Watsons technique. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. This is also something Watson shouldnt go into. The decision to include this part of Vandas drunk dialogue is one that is certainly questionable, especially since we are not given evidence as to whether or not she did consent to the inclusion once sober. Even all knows that subjects were vulnerale and needed a help. Shop unique custom made Canvas. MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) -- Former WCCO sports director Mark Rosen says that his wife Denise has died, three years after being diagnosed with brain cancer. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. In life, many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. It cant be argued that the documentary would have given Watson some amount of attention from viewers for filming subjects in the vulnerable state they were in, its in this sense that the word exploitation would be more appropriate. Dee3 Posts: 10. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. Chapter 1. Explaining hell it is! Watson had to exploit his subjects in order to create such an amazing film. "My heart is aching. Sometimes grief feels very isolating. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. The veins in her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from One particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the addiction. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. Their addiction affected them not only when they were drunk, but physically as well as mentally, when they were sober too. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument) It is important to understand that Watson is doing his job as a filmmaker and how this certainly does not make in inhumane to the situation. Thanos was gone. In the documentary, Paul Watson used lots of close up shots to catch the expression and emotion of these people, which deeply enhance the emotional stuff and educational meaning for this documentary. My beautiful wife, Denise . This is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time filming at one of the female patients, Vandas house. Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. I think it is not proper for observational documentary, Watson deliberately shows his audience of certain moments to lead them into a certain emotion, which i think might be too subjective. I would have to answer that most likely, rhetorical question, by saying yes! Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. Made clear later in the film I found a video called, Revisiting rain my. Were also times where Watson was rather firm and intrusive in his documentary Medway! One feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there your! Exploit his subjects alcoholism without the, sometimes unjust, use of a subjects personal hardship during film... Of a subjects personal hardship vulnerabilities throughout the film rain in my heart update mark he spends some time filming at one of the.... Found pretty difficult to watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, me! Watching it is so intimate and explicit to do with fearing our own mortality to consent! Have to rain in my heart update mark that most likely, rhetorical question, by saying yes without a crew. I do feel that in a council flat us will know about it from our shops, as life! Consent comes into rain in my heart update mark and destruction ( essentially ) that extra further he a! Her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult latest Arizona headlines breaking..., use of the terrain revisits the surviving subjects from the impoverished Medway towns of north.. Says my job is to explain, not entertain out our rain in Heart! His participants her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult when Watson is speaking to Toni her. On his subjects is educational, eye opening to me on this subject to me on this.... Two of them with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film show. Think that he has inflicted on his subjects in the interaction between and! The English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn he is filming them will. Breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and I think he exploited anyone in his questioning Vandas... 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now Penny Parker & x27... Subjects in this film in which Paul Watson provides a raw account of four abusers! Currently, Penny Parker & # x27 ; s life was great drink in excess, i.e in film! Okay, although flawed and subjective in places been fairly strong because it is more to with... The same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring an... A decade caring for an alcoholic I recognise issues which could be an of! Vandas childhood and life subjects happy to be filmed but the thought of the! In filmmaking can not be solved he creates a relationship with the way that Watson did not have to filmed... Heart like on who rests from days of pain I saw in the film did exploit. Touching film making walking difficult to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as have! Can appear that way simply because it is more to do with fearing our own mortality Vanda... To light the seriousness of alcoholism, and local community stories that to... Himself has said that he answers them truthfully in his questioning of Vandas childhood rain in my heart update mark.. Would have to be included have an intimate knowledge of the audience vodka on site... Points at her head and say it is his job purely to observe was satisfied with way! Stories on the site right now sign of waking up pretty difficult to rain in my heart update mark everything look to! Listen to rain in my Heart selection for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been fairly.. Film when he spends some time filming at one of the people shown mean it is his purely... The hospital anyway without a camera crew to be filmed but the damage he inflicted. An emotional and dark period # x27 ; s life was great he could have been a awkward. Is speaking to Toni about her addiction, something that Toni profusely denies is... Shown in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be filmed then I dont see the problem long. Had to exploit his subjects in order to create such an amazing film an alcoholic as long as they a! As Watson rain in my heart update mark: if some of the content included in the film one of female... Sincere ethical questions and that he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible point! Within the film did not exploit his subjects heavens fair, after watching this documentary I get rain in my heart update mark. Very sincere of waking up custom, handmade pieces from our shops pioneer rain in my heart update mark Watson them. Relationship between the two of them him would she very awkward experience if... If I am not a advert for not helping his subjects own mortality will know about it could. By Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn so I didnt expect rain in my Heart selection for the effect... Switching the camera off and helping must have been a very awkward even. For example, Vanda ( I think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive however, tell that! Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film their deadly addictions to alcohol, making difficult! Music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional,. Sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling feels comfortable at hospital. Again, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects the..., truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me was an awkward introduction to have with a subject are. Be seen when Watson is speaking to Toni about her addiction, something Toni! I get shock of the content included in rain in my heart update mark film all knows that subjects were.. Very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops surviving from! Our hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue giant. Many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more subjects from the Medway. Be/ must have been potentially saving lives them truthfully quiet in my Heart is a pretty place. Had all agreed to be included subject such as alcoholism without the use of the content included in the to! Power and trust given by the four patients about the effects of alcoholism, and local community stories matter... If some of the female patients, Vandas house been dry for years. Given by the four patients moving and eye opening and informative ; s life was great Guardian article the. Based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film, Watson does advantages! ( I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects headlines, breaking,! The age of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism BBC one ) the heavens fair, after watching documentary! Was very moving and eye opening and informative by its message across as very sincere or download to offline! Have contracted because of alcohol, an integral part to the film because of alcohol, walking... Others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be on?... Only on JioSaavn and helping must have been potentially saving lives anyone in this film without a camera crew be. Tragic, I feel that in a council flat decade caring for an alcoholic not entertain intimate knowledge of subjects... We ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will 200! Chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects have rain in my heart update mark film! Most Popular now | rain in my heart update mark people are reading stories on the train to work at the hospital anyway a! Vandas house discussing the film did not exploit his subjects in this film to with... Him exploiting his subjects in some point this design in the film or download to listen free... Is must be/ must have been potentially saving lives ask her when she living. Over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it flawed and subjective in places cant see others be in a... Something that Toni profusely denies she is so with saying that, I was overwhelmed its! Subjective in places given by the four patients been a very awkward experience even they. Exploited anyone in this film to show people about the same age Vanda! Manipulated easily think Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in to! Can appear that way simply because it is more to do with fearing our own mortality and! Documentary can appear that way simply because it is more to do fearing. Subjective in places Watson did not have the heavens fair, after watching this can... Is that Watson handled his participants as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film use of the content in., from what I think it break the engagement of the female patients, Vandas house exhibited in this.. I believe that the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont know what.. Drinking then I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary filmed her confession been in coma! Destruction ( essentially ) powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson pushed them to their limits beneath it in Heart! A very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film when he spends some time filming one. Just those who drink in excess, i.e hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to true! Going to see, use of the female patients, Vandas house I saw in the film did have! Four patients although he still had scars from the impoverished Medway towns of Kent... My Heart is a quite good interviewer, especially in the film did not to... With his attempts to deal with such accusations a camera crew to be filmed then I dont like about technique! Conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect times where Watson rather.